Talk:Space Science Fiction Magazine

Space Science Fiction Magazine has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 30, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
October 16, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
June 17, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I guess this is about as short as they get, which means there ain't much that can go wrong...passing Chubbles 07:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not promoted

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Even though this article didn't get promoted, it's still quality work and a nice reference. Thanks for bringing it up to high standards.—RJH (talk) 15:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks; I appreciate it. And thanks for the support at FAC; your reorganization suggestion definitely improved the article. Mike Christie (talk) 01:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic