Talk:Space Shuttle external tank

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Space Shuttle external tank. ... I made the following changes:

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Could mention modification for use in core stage of SLS

edit

Space_Launch_System#Core_Stage says it will be a modified SS external tank - but no mention here. Could say in more detail what changes are being made and what of the original ET design is being kept for SLS ? - Rod57 (talk) 19:47, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

No mention of forward attachment point for the orbiter

edit

Not clear in any of the images. Was it at the top or bottom of the intertank ? Was it not intended to take any significant load ? - Rod57 (talk) 10:36, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Space Shuttle external tank

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Space Shuttle external tank's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "NSFTrades":

  • From Space Launch System: Chris Bergin (October 4, 2011). "SLS trades lean towards opening with four RS-25s on the core stage". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
  • From RS-25: Chris Bergin (October 4, 2011). "SLS trades lean towards opening with four RS-25s on the core stage". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved December 14, 2011.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 23:53, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply