Talk:Spaceway-2

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spaceway-2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

SPACEWAY-2 should be merged with SPACEWAY-1

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

SPACEWAY-2 should be merged with SPACEWAY-1, and quite possibly with SPACEWAY itself. There is nothing sufficiently different between the first two spacecraft, and their SPACEWAY-specific parts of their missions were disabled by DirecTV. The irony is that SPACEWAY-2 and SPACEWAY-1 are not going to be SPACEWAY birds. The SPACEWAY-3 satellite is going to have true SPACEWAY mission. --KJRehberg 23:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Strong oppose, both are notable independently, no need to deviate from standard practice. --G W… 11:31, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Spaceway F2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic