Talk:Spanish royal family
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Material from Spanish royal family was split to House of Bourbon-Anjou on 07:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC) from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
 | The contents of the House of Bourbon-Anjou page were merged into Spanish royal family on 6 March 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Spanish royal family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090504004412/http://www.codespa.org/epages/Codespa.sf/ to http://www.codespa.org/epages/Codespa.sf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430211149/http://www.prnewswire.de/cgi/release?id=42594 to http://www.prnewswire.de/cgi/release?id=42594
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
merge \ name change
editi didn't visit this page for a lot of time, and I noticed that the name of the article is no longer "House of Bourbon-Anjou", why was the name changed? 93.173.108.138 (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
"House of Bourbon–Anjou" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect House of Bourbon–Anjou has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 4 § House of Bourbon–Anjou until a consensus is reached. DrKay (talk) 11:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- I merged back the contents of House of Bourbon-Anjou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) to this article, rendering the RfD discussion moot. The previous split, back in 2022, along with subsequent editing, was executed so badly that neither article pointed to the other. I have no particular opinion whether the Bourbon-Anjou article should be split or not, but in the future please discuss or at minimum advertise such moves. Thank you. No such user (talk) 17:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- There doesn't appear to be any material to rescue. I couldn't find any of it in the sources or the article body. DrKay (talk) 19:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- No objection from me, I'm here mostly due to procedural reasons. Glancing over the GBook search, there are sources referring to the house as "Bourbon-Anjou", but I'm unimpressed with their overall quality (many are from the 19th century). No such user (talk) 08:55, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- There doesn't appear to be any material to rescue. I couldn't find any of it in the sources or the article body. DrKay (talk) 19:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)