Talk:Special 301 Report
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The contents of the Priority Foreign Country page were merged into Special 301 Report on 23 Jul 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2019 and 27 November 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Davesbaker.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Criticism section
editThe new criticism section needs work on the language, which should be neutral, and it needs citation. In the moment it is not clear if it is original research or comes from Peter Drahos, Information Feudalism... left message on User:BannerMarshall talk page.--SasiSasi (talk) 21:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
additions by AaronDLJ
editmessages from AaronDLJ talk page: Hi there, thanks for your contribution, but you cannot just add information to articles without source. I will remove what you have added to the Special 301 Report article without source. You can add the information again if you find a source.--SasiSasi (talk) 10:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Can you please read No original research, Verifiability and Reliable sources Citing sources before contributing to the Special 301 Report article? You are adding original research, with no sources, and you are removing sourced information for no apparent reason. The article does need expanding. But not with un-sourced original research. Please find sources before adding to the article. --SasiSasi (talk) 10:36, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Into Paragraph Correction
editShould, in the introductory paragraph, the text "Special 201 report" be changed to "Special 301 report"? --98.244.123.107 (talk) 03:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)