Talk:Special Forces Support Group

Battle of Tora Bora???

No SAS were present at Tora Bora, only a handful of SBS supporting the single Delta Squadron. I am taking that part out. Read Kill Bin Laden. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.91.189.138 (talk) 04:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Merge with Joint Special Forces Support Group

Sure, why not. It's most likely the same outfit that it speaks of. --Jpfagerback 15:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

I think it could be the same outfit. however I'm not 100% sure but I think it probably is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.109.177 (talk • contribs)

Yeah Its definatly the Special Forces Support Group. Before it was given its official name it was described as being similar to the US rangers and many people including the media jumped on it as the UK Rangers which is now known to be inccorect. So it is definatly the Special Forces Support Group. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.109.177 (talk • contribs)

I also agree with the merge, both articles talk about the same unit. --Nkcs 19:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Merge it. There is no 'SFSG' - only the 'JSFSG' which is a Battalion plus sized Tier 2 organisation based around 1 PARA. It also includes a Company of Royal Marines and approx 30 RAF Regiment types to guard things. Darth Doctrinus 00:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it should be merged. However, the unit is called the Special Forces Support Group, not Joint Special Forces Support Group, as it clearly says in the MOD releases. Hammersfan 14/05/06, 17.30 BST

Sure, whatever. I understand that everything has to have some sort of reference, so you are correct. Perhaps I should have said 'we call it the JSFSG.' Kind regards. Darth Doctrinus 19:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Is this correct ?

Organisation "The SFSG is split into one support company and four line companies (three Para and one Royal Marines). A line company is then divided into two squadrons, each squadron has four troops; three assault troops and one reconnaissance. There has been speculation that each line company is specialised in a specific role. The RAF platoon will act as Pathfinders to secure or create landing zones for assault forces."

It does not follow the normal British Army orbat 4 Coys and 1 Sp Coy, I can accept. Where is the source for the statement they are then divided into two squardons of four troops ? the Infantry has Companys and Platoons as does the Marines. The Armoured Corps , Signals , RLC and SAS has Squadrons and Troops Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't strike me as legit, the Corps have a Company/ Troop structure. A Coy is an SO2 Command; Major or Squadron Leader where a Troop/ Platoon is an SO3 Command; Captain or Flight Lieutenant. It's not out of the question that the crabs refer to themselves as a Squadron though, unless the rocks are integrated into the Coys. Strikes me as a USian contribution, we wouldn't normally use Line Coy this side of the pond.

ALR (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Sounds like waffle, RAF Regiment don't have anywhere near the capability to carry out the Pathfinder role. The Pathfinder platoon would, obviously, still fulfil this requirement for SFSG dropzones. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.133.26.2 (talk) 23:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Special Forces Support Group.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Special Forces Support Group.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 23 August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Special Forces Support Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060424185305/http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/MilitaryOperations/SpecialForcesSupportGroupFormsInWales.htm to http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/MilitaryOperations/SpecialForcesSupportGroupFormsInWales.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Insigne du Special Forces Support Group (SFSG).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)