Talk:Spectral bat/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dunkleosteus77 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 22:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm assuming you mean the single line breaks? I generally write articles like that better because I find it easier to organize and read. There isn't a policy about it, and it doesn't affect how the text is displayed to the reader.
Okay, just wondering   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Because when I read, "It is the largest bat species in the New World," then I wanna know how big that is   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
done
done.
George Gilbert Goodwin. Doesn't have an article. I could (1) remove his name entirely—"The genus and species names were not used in their current combination until 1942." or (2) add more information—"The genus and species names were not used in their current combination until Goodwin did so in his 1942 publication, "Mammals of Honduras."
Or say "...biologist George Gilbert Goodwin..."   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
done
done
Many mammals have tribosphenic molars, molars with three cusps. Basically, most of its molars are the "normal" tribosphenic design while the last upper molars are smaller with only two cusps. I hyperlinked to vestigiality|reduced, but let me know if I can make that clearer in-text.
Yeah the link to vestigial just confused me, maybe try, "...as opposed to three in most mammals," or something   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
done
I added leaf-nosed bat to the lede with a hyperlink. I also hyperlinked the firs occurrence in the article. Leaf-nosed bat is the common name for bats in the family Phyllostomidae.
merged & restructured
Which instances of taxonomic names do you think should be replaced?
Like you say Trachops instead of "fringe-lipped bat"   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
done
done
added
removed
removed
They were a holdover from before I started editing. I have removed most of them (and am fine removing the rest), but can you find the policy that says ADW is a non-RS? I can't locate it (though I did notice that the taxonbar links to ADW).
I haven’t seen a policy, it’s just every time I have an article with ADW, the reviewer says it’s not reliable, which I’ve never really understood since it’s written by university students and reviewed by professors   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  15:25, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
removed the last of them anyway
Just went through all the refs and added a URL to them if a free source was available or added doi-access=free if doi led to open-access ref.