Talk:Spectral theory of compact operators

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 2003:E6:13D8:6F00:3D7C:CA8B:1F03:8FFC in topic Theorem ii.)

Bounded Sequences Have Weakly Convergent Subsequences?

edit

In the proof of one of the Lemmas in the article it is used that every bounded sequence has a weakly convergent subsequence. In the Wikipedia Article Reflexive_Banach_space it is stated that this rule can only be applied in reflexive Banach spaces, so my question here is: Why are we allowed to use this fact? I know that most of the times, one is interested in compact operators on Hilbert spaces and they are clearly reflexive, but in general, I don't see why this is allowed here. --130.83.2.27 (talk) 13:31, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hm, you might be right there. I am going to revert to your version, pending me taking a look later. Mct mht (talk) 01:03, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Theorem ii.)

edit

For some reason in the theorem, the notation switches from \lambda to \lambda_i, which has not been introduced before. I guess this is just a typo, or am I overlooking something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E6:13D8:6F00:3D7C:CA8B:1F03:8FFC (talk) 08:23, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply