Talk:Spermicide
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
risk of hiv transmission and Nonoxynol-9
editthe demonstrated increased risk of hiv infection with use of N9 warrants mention here. should be added to risks and in body of article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emhawkins (talk • contribs) 02:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, as a HIV educator for Aids Health Organization, we recommend all persons to use water base lubercant, due to spermicide irritation that allows HIV to enter into the human body. signed D.L. Sais —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.73.26.150 (talk) 11:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'll be working on bringing the material in the nonoxynol-9 article into here. Allens (talk) 17:40, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
"pregnancy rate" rather than "failure rate"
editNote discussion at Talk:Birth control#"pregnancy rate" rather than "failure rate" re replacing occurrences of "failure rate" with "pregnancy rate". I would also like to see the same change on this page. Please make any comments there. --Coppertwig 04:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Globalize request
editThis article was recently tagged as U.S.-centric. I'm not sure why - it discusses several spermicides not available in the U.S. - neem is only available in India, menfegol in Europe, BZK in Canada and France. I believe the list is comprehensive. The description of octoxynyl-9 only mentions the U.S. - because it was only ever available in the U.S., and is now not available anywhere. I would like to fix any problems with this article, and would appreciate an explanation of why the tag was placed. Lyrl Talk C 02:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Saturated sugar solution as spermicide?
editSaturated sugar solution as spermicide - does it work?
Intro
edit"Spermicides are unscented, clear, unflavored, non-staining, and lubricative."
Is that necessarily the case? I thought that it was possible and perhaps even likely for there to be fluids that aren't totally clear, or have some kind of scent? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.47.150.42 (talk) 01:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Distinguish spermicide (alone) versus spermicide in conjunction with barrier methods
editThe pregnancy rate for this contraceptive may leave a lot of readers confused unless it's distinguished in which capacity the spermicide is being used. While it's available in tablet, gel, or film form, most people encounter N9 as a condom lubricant. It would be good to know the relative performance of spermicide alone versus no contraception and spermicide combined with barrier method relative to only barrier and no contraception. These distinctions will help readers also to make informed decisions about their own contraceptive choices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saffloped (talk • contribs) 21:23, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
merge vaginal film
editSuggest Vaginal contraceptive film be merged into this article. Just be one of the various methods of delivering spermicide (creams, gels, etc.) Zodon (talk) 07:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- In the absence of objections over this last year, I have merged these two articles. LT90001 (talk) 11:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Contragel Green?
editHello, I'm wondering if the lack of mention of Contragel Green[1], a non-nonoxinol-9 spermicide that is approved for use in the EU and Canada, is an indication that it's total crap. ;) Does anyone know anything more about this product or should I go ahead and add a bit? Thanks. dmnapolitano (talk) 14:20, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Spermicide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060926032018/http://www.contraceptiononline.org/contrareport/article01.cfm?art=93 to http://www.contraceptiononline.org/contrareport/article01.cfm?art=93
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Spermicide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114062634/http://www.cervicalbarriers.org/information/sponges.cfm to http://www.cervicalbarriers.org/information/sponges.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Spermicide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060821160516/http://www.aids.net.au/aids-lemons.pdf to http://www.aids.net.au/aids-lemons.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060813111633/http://www.moondragon.org/obgyn/contraception/spermicides.html to http://www.moondragon.org/obgyn/contraception/spermicides.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20040225190349/http://observer.thecentre.centennialcollege.ca/features/condom_museum011904.htm to http://observer.thecentre.centennialcollege.ca/features/condom_museum011904.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 10 December 2017 (UTC)