Talk:Spirit of Atlanta Drum and Bugle Corps
Latest comment: 10 years ago by GWFrog in topic Untitled
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spirit of Atlanta Drum and Bugle Corps article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI must request that certain contributions stop being removed or labeled insider info. I contribute to this article in an official capacity for Spirit of Atlanta, and it is very frustrating to see the effort that was put into gathering and documenting this history from first hand sources dismissed.
Please contact me if you would like to discuss changes to the article in terms of tone or specific content, but please do not simply remove large amounts of data. Again - this has been gathered from first hand sources.
MrNailbat (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Please be so kind as to note that:
- A) This article is not the property of Spirit of Atlanta, so your "official capacity" has no bearing; this article is the property of Wikipedia...
- Thus:
- B) Prior approval of content by the subject of an article is completely out of line with Wikipedia's position of neutrality...
- And:
- C) "..First hand sources..." and "...insider info..." are inappropriate for an encyclopedic article such as this is supposed to be...
- GWFrog (talk) 16:24, 26 April 2014 (UTC)