Talk:Spirit of Justice

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Duckduckstop in topic name

Untitled

edit

Hairhorn seems to be on an anti Terry Ward hate rant lately and so removed relevant content about pop culture reference to Spirit if Justice. As a partisan Terry Ward defender, I leave it to the Wiki community to decide ---though I ~expect~ either Hairhorn or a "sock" threrof to stifle discussion forthwith.

You seem to have a problem with me, but you don't ever bother communicating with me on my talk page. You keep adding the work on of non-notable artists to pages that where they aren't relevant. You engage in sockpuppetry. You make personal attacks in deletion discussions. And somehow I'm the one that's on a "vendetta," as you say in your edit summary. The next time you want to accuse me of something, at least have the guts to post on my talk page. Hairhorn (talk) 13:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image

edit

Is there anyone who could find a better usable image for this page? I think ideally the picture should focused on the statue, instead of on John Ashcroft with the statue blurry in the background.--Yaksar (let's chat) 03:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

normally so, but what made this particular statue "known" was that it kept appearing in news photo-ops behind key fbi/doj staff and it was amusing when the speaker's subject was "fighting pornography" to have a giant nude looming behind him. that led to the bush II era "censorship" with the drapes. the current photo is a good example of showing just what got the statue so famously covered up. otherwise though, yeah there DOES need to be an image of her just on her own. there must be something out there somewhere ---some image of just the statue. good point. Cramyourspam (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)cramyourspamReply

File:Ashcroft soj.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Ashcroft soj.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

name

edit

smithsonian says majesty of justice [1], changed back. Duckduckstop (talk) 17:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply