Talk:Spittin' Chiclets

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 10:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Nominator has indicated on their talk page that they will no longer be pursuing this nomination.

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that an ad read on the podcast Spittin' Chiclets unintentionally sparked a 100 million dollar vodka brand? Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolschram/2019/12/18/pink-whitney-scores-for-spittin-chiclets-barstool-sports-and-new-amsterdam-vodka/?sh=7b26cd93721f
  • Reviewed: [[]]

Created by Newtothisedit (talk). Self-nominated at 01:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC).

• Hi there, Newtothisedit, and welcome to DYK! Article is new enough and long enough, but I'm afraid the article's sourcing falls short of DYK's reliability standards. I see that the hook is cited to a Forbes contributor – unlike Forbes itself, that would be a WP:RSP no-go. I also don't trust Podbay as a statistics source – I don't see solid evidence of editorial oversight or WP:USEBYOTHERS. The Hustle and theScore.com don't strike me as particularly reliable either, but I won't harangue over that too much. Business Wire is fully a PR source, and I wouldn't count The Equinox as reliable under WP:RSSM. Hopefully that's something we can get fixed up? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
• without response, marking for closure :( theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• @Newtothisedit: In case you missed this. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)