Talk:Splendour in the Grass
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Splendour in the Grass article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from Splendour in the Grass was split to List of Splendour in the Grass line-ups on 23 July 2019 at 07:58. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Untitled comments
editWow, maybe if the author had their shit together they could have got themselves a ticket. I managed to get 12
this is pretty fucked someone who actually knows needs to fix it up or delete it
- I removed some swearing just then, but being somewhat of a wiki newbie, am not game to remove or edit large sections. I'm pretty sure some large sections such as...
At 12:00pm on Ann Street in Brisbane, QLD, hundereds of patrons who missed out on a ticket began to riot in the street outside the Ticketing Solutions Pty Ltd headquarters. Rioters smashed their way through the front foyer and into the board room, only to find a note reading "Thankyou for your patience, please do not hit refresh or we will kick you in the balls. Please wait 60 seconds until trashing this office."
- ...are incorrect, but please if I'm wrong... ;P ForgottenSin 08:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Its idiots like this that are the reson for unis not allowing student to reference wiki. Ticket solutions doesn't even have an office on Ann st.
Ahem. Personally, I found the changes to be absolutely hilarious. The ticketing system was a joke, therefore I think Splendor's wiki article should also be treated as one. Wiki is an unreliable source in the eyes of universities not only because of its content, but also its process. It has not undergone scrutiny from experts and officials that a publication would generally undergo. Of course the article needed to be changed, eventually, but there is no reason to be so uptight. I pity those without a sense of humor, how dry your lives must be! --Meeksa 07:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Under 2011, Foster the Lager should be Foster the people, and Tim Minchin is not on the list. There may be other errors tooGillwoman (talk) 12:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Gillwoman
Article needs a clean-up
editThis wikientry is pretty below par.
- Intro paragraph is out of date, * 2008 entry should be in past tense, * References should be in-line
- EL yourgigs should be in-line references, * More references overall —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperjunk (talk • contribs) 09:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Splendour in the Grass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120808034101/http://www.fasterlouder.com.au/festivalawards/2009/results/winners/ to http://www.fasterlouder.com.au/festivalawards/2009/results/winners/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)