Talk:Spock's Beard

The name, Spock's Beard

• http://www.spocksbeard.com/faq.html

-the above link has the information related to the naming of the band "Spock's Beard", however it just says in general terms about a mirror universe and Spock having a beard, not that the actual original Star Trek episode revealing these fictional phenomena was the influence, but rather the idea. More information is needed to definitively state that they are named after the episode; Mirror, Mirror or just the idea of an other dimensional Spock having a beard, which in the episode quoted in the article, Spock does not have a full beard(modern parlance) but a goatee. Is a goatee a beard. It seems possible that the band members were using a wacky yet strangely profound idea of Spock haveing a beard rather than they actually referring to the above stated Star Trek series episode.--Book M 10:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

2006 Tour Info

May 4 (Thu) - Poughkeepsie, NY - The Chance Theater

May 5 (Fri) - New York, NY - BB King Blues Club & Grill

May 6 (Sat) - Springfield, VA - Jaxx

May 7 (Sun) - Chicago, IL - House Of Blues

May 8 (Mon) - Denver, CO - Bluebird Theatre

May 9 (Tue) - Seattle, WA - Studio Seven (tickets available here)

May 12 (Fri) - W. Hollywood, CA - The Key Club

May 13 (Sat) - Santa Ana, CA - Galaxy Theatre

May 14 (Sun) - Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX - Ridglea Theater

Progessive metal?

The Progressive metal article seems to classify Spock's Beard as progressive metal - is this correct or not? This article seems to state it is not. - 00:27, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Arguments about where bands fit in the scheme of the audiences' creation are really never-ending, and I can see why some might consider Spock's Beard a prog-metal outfit. I don't happen to agree -- it sounds more like Kansas than anyone I've ever heard, and most people would agree that Kansas wasn't metal -- but I'm open to accepting someone else's position that it is. Mitchell k dwyer 12:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Spock's Beard is usually classified by prog sites as Symphonic Prog. I've also seen them listed as Neo-Prog or even Third-Wave Prog. That's more with Neal, though. The new band is harder rock and much closer to Progressive Metal then before, but I don't think it's quite Prog Metal.

Discography

Hi thanks for your work on the Neal Morse article and this one - not sure I agree with the format of the SB discography - although it adds more information about Neal's envolvement I personally think it more 'bity'. What do others think? :: Kevinalewis : please contact me on my Talk Page : 09:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

It was a trial. I wasn't sure how it'd look. The main thing is that other band's discographies with major personnel changes aren't divided up, so I've changed it back. Chiok 08:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Great - not a great issue - but although it contained more information and however much we like Neal I did think it added too much visual complexity in listing for a group that is attempting to move on from being in Neal's shadow. Maybe even that statement is a bit harse on the guys. Anyway thanks for all your work on the entries. :: Kevinalewis : please contact me on my Talk Page : 10:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

I updated the page and see the changes were reverted. As far as the new album goes, there is a CONFIRMED release date of Tuesday, Nov 21st. The info on the wiki page is outdated

Flower Kings hard rock approach???

What Flower Kings would that be? I'd say the FloKi have a more jazz-rock vibe, but hard rock is plain nonsense. --Cb007 22:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Genre discussion

If you have ever heard Spock's beard, there are sections that sound like everything from classical to metal. Progressive Rock is the genre that a band that has transitions like that would be. Jazz Fusion should not be inlcuding in it, while they do have jazzy sections they also have metal, country, singer songwriter and many others. Why is Jazz Fusion speical? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.29.31 (talk) 20:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

While all you say above is true - there is no reason to include each one in the "Genre" attribution. What is needed there is the main style of the music, which is "progressive rock" or "hard progressive rock". :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 06:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I was trying to so take away Jazz Fusion which someone appearently did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.29.31 (talk) 17:16, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I removed it because I felt it was strangely specific for the infobox at the exclusion of other, possibly more germane, genres. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 19:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

History

Whoa! there's a black hole concerning the entire first ten years, 1992 - 2002 -- surely fans have something to relate about this period? Doceddi (talk) 11:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm going to have a look at this and see if I can flesh out some of the early years and maybe clean up the rest. Difficult to find many sources from 20+ years ago, but there seems to be a few good ones that might do. Liambarrett1986 (talk) 11:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

First draft of update is finished, tidied up a lot of the prose, removed unnecessary/non-notable info and added references for what was already there. Will begin fleshing out the Neal Morse-era with more details next. Liambarrett1986 (talk) 16:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)