Talk:Spolia

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2.103.199.143 in topic Photo caption contradiction

Sorry

edit

I wanted to put Bibliography after See also per Wikipedia:See also#Standard appendices and descriptions but then changed mind and did not hit Undo enough times. --84.20.17.84 09:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem, understood. --Javits2000 10:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Chart

edit

By the way, the thumbnail of that lovely chart of the Arch of Constantine doesn't show up on my browser; although the image itself displays clearly when I click on it. This may only be a problem on my end; but has anyone else noticed the same thing? --Javits2000 13:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Photo caption contradiction

edit

The caption on this page says, "Fragments of Greek inscriptions in the masonry of the Ottoman Heptapyrgion (Yedikule) fortress (1431), Thessaloniki." However, the description on the image page, File:THES-Heptapyrgion spolia 3.jpg, claims that the inscription is Roman.--Duesouthfan (talk) 15:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

The alphabet is Greek, that is why it is described as a Greek inscription. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.103.199.143 (talk) 01:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply