Talk:Spook's

Fair use rationale for Image:Latscan2.jpg

Image:Latscan2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Creatures of the dark links

Several of the internal links in this section either lead back to this article, or lead to irrelevent informaation. I think they should either be led to a more relevent aticle not a page listing several articles that mention them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coho (talk • contribs) 19:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Language and the Article

A message to the other user or users editing this article!

First off, excellent work on the research, I found it both interesting and intriguing, however I also edit this article and have found that the language being used is rather childish and lists the events etc rather than offering insight and explaining events, it also seems highly disorganized. I suggest we cooperate somehow or the other asap! Though I don not have much time on my hands to edit this article, due to exams and so on.

To Coho

That's what I mean whoever else is editing this article, is failing to reach quality standards!

--Setikh (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes something must be done about this. Maby we should all get together and brain storm on what to do next. By that I mean have one or two people lead and the rest do what they do best,some one do the research we need, some one do the programing, and someone do the typing, editing and all of that. Just saying some of my thoughts here. Applechair (talk) 09:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Lamias

I found something very intresting about lamias and it pertains to the Counties on the west coast of the uk which includes Lancashire as well as cornwall. It is actually a legend of a woman who was thought of as a lamia by villagers and may be where joseph delaney got his idea. It comes from an old book that is now in public domain. I have had trouble adding things to Wikapedia and am personally fed up with it but If you want to know email me at —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.39.16.156 (talk) 00:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Help

I am the head of [1] and I could use some help fixing the pages up. it is a very little known site with no vandalism so far so I do not need police, I need editors. Any help is appreciated. Firio (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

The first major edit to bring the Wardstone Chronicles and The Spook Series together as one as we are talking about the same book with different titles. LadyFantasy (talk) 04:13, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Help

Just to let you know, John Gregory uses gamma not eta as the symbol of ghosts and ghasts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.235.140 (talk) 20:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

List of Characters???

I was thinking that perhaps there could be another article with all of the characters such as the witches, old gods, etc. due to the large amount of characters in this series? If anyone has a better idea, could you please say so? Sliverstreak of Riverclan (talk) 23:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

• Done. It's long since overdue, I think. I'm working on an overhaul of the article as a whole right now.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Massive amount of redirects

In case anyone was wondering, I'm doing a major rehaul of the page for many reasons. First off, the character page was long overdue to be made into its own article and although there are some issues with the list as far as encyclopedic-ness and neutrality goes, I'm more focusing on the book articles. The vast majority of them seem to lack any or enough reliable sources to show that they pass WP:NBOOK. Rather than drag them all through AfD or some long process, I'm redirecting them here. If sources do become available that show that the books pass notability guidelines or if the movies film all of the books, then they can be un-redirected. Until then this should pretty much be the main article with the titles redirecting here. It might not be as expansive but individual books do not gain automatic notability because they're part of a notable series. The books still have to pass notability guidelines to show that each individual volume has received ample coverage focusing on them alone.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:36, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

• I find this very confusing Tokyogirl79. You click some of the links for books and you get the book, others you get redirected to the same page. I think those should be red links or no link at all. -Reagle (talk) 16:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism by Mormons

This page has been targeted by vandal named MELLOWDRAMA88, from time of vandal to when I fixed it was 1 day; in which his account went red (dead link). I imagine its a reader of Orson Scott Card.2001:5B0:27FF:2EF0:0:0:0:39 (talk) 15:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Book summary and plot details

Hey, why do you guys always revert any additional and required information from wikipedia. User "HighnessAtharva" added the book plot and summary (in breif). That is valid and required. I dont mind erasing the nonsense things but this is intolerable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skulduggery_Pleasant_(series) Visit this article for more info. Both are just the same. I humbly request you not to revert back the changes! This is the final time! 1.23.48.151 (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)