Talk:Spuyten Duyvil and Port Morris Railroad

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Melrose

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I was surprised to see my photo at the head of this article, having thought of this inland line as distinct from the one along the Harlem River, the two being built at a different times by different men for different purposes. Apparently editors who have studied more carefully have come to another conclusion. I would be pleased if someone could dig up more details, particularly maps of different stages of development. Jim.henderson (talk) 02:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have to admit I've seen maps from the late-1860's that don't show the portion along the Harlem River. But ultimately, wasn't that the intended proposal? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 06:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just to be clear, I'm not against anybody who has more info and can add it. Having said that, it seems pretty obvious it was called the "Spuyten Duyvil" and "Port Morris" Railroad for a reason. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 12:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I probably just jumped to a conclusion from inadequate information that I no longer can find, or that never existed. Jim.henderson (talk) 21:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

More evidence regarding the section along the Harlem River

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Somebody posted this reflink on the University Heights (Metro-North station) article. ("Twenty-fourth Annual report of the Board of Railroad Commissioners of the State of New York" Board of Railroad Commissioners of the State of New York; . J.B. Lyon, State Printer, 1907)

New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company; and this Board also hereby consents, under Section 34 of the Railroad Law, to the discontinuance in the future of the station at Fordham Heights in the City of New York on the railroads (New York and Putnam Railroad, and Spuyten Duyvil and Port Morris Railroad) operated by the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad,...

The emphasis was mine, and I think that makes it clear that the freight spur and the section of the Hudson Line along the Harlem River are one in the same. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 12:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic