Talk:Squalicorax

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Macrophyseter in topic A miocene record?

corax = raven?

edit

Isn't corax latin for Raven rather than Crow? --Oskila (talk) 22:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Corvus is latin for a Crow/Raven/blackbird while Corax is the Greek for a Crow/Raven/blackbird. The actual "vernacular" name to use more correctly raven then crow, yes.--Kevmin § 02:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

A miocene record?

edit

http://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/en/periodiques/geodiversitas/39/2/le-site-paleontologique-du-grand-morier-pont-boutard-indre-et-loire-france-contexte-geologique-et-detail-biostratigraphique-des-formations-cenozoiques-partir-des-assemblages-de-vertebres-fossiles--Bubblesorg (talk) 19:12, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your link doesn't work and I'm pretty sure most editors here don't speak French. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 22:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
I glanced over the paper, and, if one, i.e., you, @Bubblesorg:, could be bothered to actually READ the paper, it states that eroded teeth of Squalicorax and other Cretaceous-aged shark genera are zombie taxa, having eroded out of their original matrix during the Miocene, and then reburied, which is actually dramatically different than being a Miocene record.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Oh so their reworked? That's pretty strange. Also, responding to the other statement guess yeah, most editors cant speak french. I used google translate--Bubblesorg (talk) 14:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
The reworking of Cretaceous fossils into the formation is pointed out in the English abstract of the paper, you don't need to know French to understand that. Macrophyseter | talk 20:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply