Talk:Squamish Five

Redirect from Direct Action

Is it reasonable that this page is a redirect from Direct Action, surely that should redirect to Direct action, the concept rather than the specific group. (User:KevinGillan)

Unnecessary references

A few references which didn't seem necessary to add to the main page:

• http://www.rapereliefshelter.bc.ca/herstory/rhvideo.html
• http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2002-1/issue6/ar-notsoradical.html

—mvcorks

Requesting verification

Is there any verification on the claim under "Litton Industries bombing" that they actually drove all the way from Vancouver to Toronto? I only ask because personally, I would fly there and then steal the pickup truck and fill it with 250kg of dynamite. I just find it incredibly implausible (and stupid) that any human being would fill a stolen vehicle with that much volatile explosive material, and then drive approximately 3000 kilometres through several provincial borders. Anyways, I'm just posing the question. Mk623SC20K 21:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Flying, instead of having to be questioned by the guards at all those provincial border crossings! Most excellent idea comrade! That way we can sneeze without igniting an explosion! Now, the truckload of dynamite, should we put that in checked baggage, or carry-on?

What are these 'Provincial Border Guards' you speak of? I drove across Canada several times and haven't seen any. This must be a new thing. They didn't have them in the 80's-90's70.79.146.225 (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Source?

• Pinkoski, M. 2003 From Pots and Pans to Guns and Bombs: Women and Direct Action MA thesis, Carleton University. (A thesis on women and direct action that uses the Squamish Five as a case study for the analysis). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pete.Hurd (talk • contribs) 18:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Squamish Five. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120225134205/http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20100518052124702 to http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20100518052124702
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120225134205/http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20100518052124702 to http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20100518052124702
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060513181243/http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/discography/g7031.php to http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/discography/g7031.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Ideology

An explanation of their ideology would be helpful.Bill (talk) 20:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)