Talk:Shribhargavaraghaviyam

File:Sribhargavaraghaviyam Rama Parasurama LowRes.JPG

The image does not correspond to the criteria of Wikipedia:NFCI#Images, thus is removed. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Please elaborate. Do you mean the article does not have critical commentary on the meeting of Parashurama and Rama? If so then the required critical commentary can be added in the narrative of the 18th/19th canto. Or do you mean the image not qualify as Cover Art or Other Promotional Material as mentioned under Wikipedia:NFCI#Images. It is the art on the first inside page of a hardbound book and should fall into one of the two categories above. The double image of Rama and Parashurama gives an impression that the two characters are independent actors in the epic, something like in the Daśāvatārakīrtidhavalam section of Gītagovindam by Jayadeva. The File:Sribhargavaraghaviyam Rama Parasurama LowRes.JPG image helps the reader identify that the epic involves Parashurama and Rama together coming on stage, which is the underlying theme (Avatars of the same deity) and subject matter of three cantos in the epic, and so it is in my opinion, required for "visual identification" of the theme of the epic. It is like saying an image for visual identification of Kirātārjunīyam would need to show both Kirātā and Arjuna together and not in two different frame in a double image. Nmisra (talk) 11:29, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

The image is neither Cover art like File:Sribhargavaraghaviyam Cover LowRes.JPG nor it is "Other promotional material: Posters, programs, billboards, ads". You can use File:Ram and Parashurama.jpg OR similar image OR create it yourself and upload it under a suitable license on wikipedia.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:37, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

While I do not agree that it is not other promotional material (an image on first page of book can be considered as one), I will request the official website of the author to release a version under a free license, which could then be used. Nmisra (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes a version can be used. Please use guidelines in Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission to gain the proper permissions.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

IAST inconsistent use and non-use of English words

• Sanskrit, Prakrit, avatar are English dictionary words. Why is IAST used for them?
• Why locations like Chitrakuta, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh are spelt in English, other geographical locations like Mount Kailash, Ayodhya, Mithila in IAST? --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

They are also Sanskrit words, and I used IAST for all Sanskrit words in the article. As regards to places, the places mentioned in the epic's narrative are spelt using IAST to be consistent with the narrative. In other sections, English is used but would be good to be consistent. I will do the changes sometime later. Nmisra (talk) 12:36, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sribhargavaraghaviyam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110409185243/http://india.gov.in/knowindia/sakademi_awards05.php to http://india.gov.in/knowindia/sakademi_awards05.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)