Talk:Sridevi: The Eternal Screen Goddess/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PinkElixir (talk · contribs) 13:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I can pick up this review. I'll have it done soon. Kind regards~ PinkElixir (talk) 13:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The prose, spelling, and grammar is of acceptable quality. I made some wording edits (mostly fixing grammar) while conducting the review. The article generally follows MoS for word choice, lead, layout, etc.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   The article has both a References and Sources section, both of which contain WP:RS. URL's to sources lead to reliable news sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article covers an appropriate summary of the book, from Nayak's conception of the idea through the writing process and critical reception.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article follows WP:NPOV.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   There is no indication of edit wars in the edit history or on the article talk page.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The image used is under a fair use license.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Apologies for the delay, but great work! Cheers~ PinkElixir (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)