 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This page is bombasted with non-NPOV phrases. Also Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a school newspaper. --Tkp2 03:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Where? Please specify/modify to improve. This comment is perhaps out of date (many edits since 2006) and NPOV tag should be removed. Any objections? --WikiJon 19:19, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Notable Faculty
editArther Wenk is NOT a notable faculty. Google Test for his book "Quarter Note Tales" gives 8 independent results and none of them a review (all of them being promotion of some kind). Refer to official wikipedia notability guidelines. --Empvector 06:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Joseph Flavelle
editIt says here that Joseph Flavelle is a graduate of St. Andrew's. However, Flavelle's article says he was born in 1858 and married in 1882, but SAC wasn't founded until 1899. Somone's dates are off. --G2bambino 01:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:SAC.jpg
edit
Image:SAC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
