Talk:St. Charles Bay/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by William S. Saturn in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Fixed.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- The sentence about the Karankawa Indians defending the settlers is out of sequence chronologically.
- A. Major aspects:
- Removed. Not essential to the bay.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- B. Focused:
- The Union bombardment did more than just stall Lamar's development. Describe what actually happened. Don't think that the Reserve at St. Charles Bay is notable.
- B. Focused:
- Added more detail.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Needs a map, badly. In fact a map is essential.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Will add a map shortly.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)- Map added.--William S. Saturn (talk) 07:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Thank you for the review on such short notice.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)