Talk:St. Peter's Square

Piazza San Pietro?

Should this page be moved to Piazza San Pietro, for the same reasons discussed for Piazza San Marco?--Margareta (talk) 19:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Statues

It would be great if someone could add info on the many (a few dozen?) statues all the way around the square. Thanks! BigSteve (talk) 18:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Size of the square

How big is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1010:B115:20AB:64EB:F4A3:2258:C6D0 (talk) 17:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

240 meters wide and 340 meters in length 212.127.148.149 (talk) 07:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Doric Order

To all: Respectfully, I changed the description of the columns from the Tuscan to the Doric order, albeit a simplified example. My reasoning is:

1. The proportions of the three parts of the entablature are Doric. 2. The entablature has dentils, suggesting Doric. 3. The architrave (lowest element of the entablature) is detailed as Doric. 4. The columns, while robust, are too tall and too slender to be Tuscan.

Lastly: I added a scholarly reference describing them as Doric.

Buckyboot (talk) 10:44, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 1 July 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Those opposing on consistency and common name grounds here have made the case in their favour. (closed by non-admin page mover) Steven Crossin ^{Help resolve disputes!} 11:50, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

---

St. Peter's Square → Saint Peter's Square – Sources seem to confirm this as an alternative. Would this be an improvement per MOS:SAINTS (and arguably indirectly WP:NOPAPER)? Per WP:CONSISTENCY with Saint Peter, Saint Peter's tomb, Chair of Saint Peter, Cross of Saint Peter, Feast of Saints Peter and Paul, List of saints named Peter, etc. PPEMES (talk) 07:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. — Newslinger talk 09:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

• Tentative Oppose per the ngrams, which are a surprise. Have to tap the blue 'Search lots of books' square to make them appear. Looks like in this case the St. or St is preferred. Will watch the discussion. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Sure. But should some contextualisation be weighted in on that material, considering print media? PPEMES (talk) 11:23, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Seems to be an overwhelming use of St. (or St) for the present name. Given their relationship this would go hand-in-hand with St. Peter's Basilica, of which the square is more or less a large entryway. My personal preference would be 'Saint' for both of those, but the numbers don't seem to support that and the Wikipedia consistency point shouldn't push it over the bar due to the prominence of the topic. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

OK. Still, has there never been a discussion on weight-giving to prevalence of print-minimalistic abbreviations in the printed past on Wikipedia? On a side not,e we have the recognisability perspective. How can we be so sure about that 100 % of readers really know what "St." or "St" stands for, and expect that people take the millisecond to unpack that in their mind reading the article title? To add to this, with the neverending inconisistentcy between precisely "St." and "St", which indicate that giving a few pixles more for spelling out the full word seems like a quite attractive alternative, even when assessing weight in sources. Isn't that arguably what happened to Archbasilica of Saint John Lateran, and Cathedral of Saint Elias and Saint Gregory the Illuminator? PPEMES (talk) 11:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

St. Peter's Square is the common name well backed up by ngrams. Randy Kryn (talk) 21:52, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Should abbreviations in printed material be more assessed in accordance with pecisely its print context? PPEMES (talk) 21:57, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

• Support. American English uses "St." Commonwealth English usually uses "St". This is in a non-English-speaking country, so the compromise is sensible. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:31, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose unless soundly rebutted. I know for a fact that officially St. Petersburg, FL is not spelled "Saint Petersburg". COMMONNAME and OFFICIALNAME might both be true in the case of St. Peter's Square and St. Peter's Basilica. And I think that people will usually assign another meaning to "St.", such as "street", only when it does not come right before a person's name. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  21:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose per WP:CONSISTENCY with St. Peter's Basilica. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Border markings...

How and where in the pavement is the border between the Vatican and Italy marked ? Autokefal Dialytiker (talk) 13:06, 7 June 2022 (UTC)