Talk:St. Stephen's Episcopal Church (Beverly, New Jersey)

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are two articles, St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, Beverly and St. Stephens Episcopal Church which are clearly the same church. I suggest that they be merged at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, Beverly because that is by far the bigger article; however, whilst I would like to have been WP:BOLD and done it without discussion, I have noticed several discrepancies and am unable to decide which version is correct. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree it is obviously a merge that should be implemented, and in the direction you suggest, to the ", Beverly" article because that is the older article. I went ahead and implemented it, addressing minor discrepancies in the infoboxes in the two articles, in the process. All done i think. Thanks taking the time to identify the problem and for posting notice of this at wt:NRHP where i saw it. --do ncr am 01:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic