Talk:St Caffo's Church, Llangaffo/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Dr. Blofeld in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:Dr. Blofeld 11:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • What is meant exactly by an "Early English style". Are their any architectural elements which have a formal name?
  • You might consider splitting the section from "The 19th-century church is still in use and belongs to the Church in Wales. " into a Services section.
  • The section is named"History and location". I had expected to see a brief location description. Can you add a sentence to say the church is located xxxx miles south of xxxx near the xxxx etc in both the lead and this section? Example: The church is located along the B4419 road in the northern part of the village of Llangaffo, roughly 5 miles northwest of Caernarfon by air. Please also note this in the lead.
  • Added what I can.
  • I'd rather not, for consistency with other articles in the series which all have the same sectioning.
  • Ooops, forgot that. Added.
How's it looking now? BencherliteTalk 14:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that's fine, nice job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

This is a quality article which meets all of the GA criteria, short, but very well focused and written, the way an encyclopedia article should be. It's not ready for FA though yet, I think more detail would be needed for that. Good job, I'm promoting this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply