Talk:St Chad's Church, Poulton-le-Fylde/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Initial comments

edit

I've had a quick read of the article, but have not yet checked any of the citations, etc; and, on that basis, the article appears to be at or about GA-standard. I'm, now going to work my way through the article section by section by leaving the WP:Lead until last. Pyrotec (talk) 13:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC) At this point I will only be highlighting "problems", if any although I may fix any trivial ones as I work my way through the article.Reply

I found no "problems", so the rest of this subsection is blank. Pyrotec (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive, well-referenced, well-illustrated article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Well illustrated, with most of the photographs provided by the nominator.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing a fine article. Pyrotec (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply