This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article appears to have little mention of negatives about the subject matter, and is not verifiable for the majority of claims.
- I agree. I have removed the worst of the advertising and what is left is virtually unsourced apart from some external links in the body of text which is just bad writing. If anyone has the time to sort these so we can see if this passes notability with RS that would be one step in the right direction. Mramoeba (talk) 21:30, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Done. Tacyarg (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)