Talk:St Kilda Road

Untitled

The link to Victoria Barracks does not link to the one in Melbourne. -Colin MacDonald — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.121.229 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Stanhill flats

Stanhill flats were not Housing Commission Properties - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.53.99 (talk) 00:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Lead image (through NGV waterfall)

The current lead image is the silliest and most unencyclopaedic image I've ever seen. I'm astounded that it has lasted so long. It wouldn't even be suitable to illustrate the NGV. About the only article I can see it illustrating is Glass walls with water dripping down it but I see that doesn't exist as yet! ;-) Admittedly, the majority of the other images are not of the road itself but rather sites along the road, but that is still no reason to keep the existing lead image there. I'm going to go ahead and remove it - just wanted to make my intentions clear. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 10:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I'll take a more suitable photo of the road the next time I'm in the city and remember. invincible 13:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Map request

Hello. Would it be possible for someone to add a map of Melbourne with this road emboldened please? I think this would be extremely useful. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation style

Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:08, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on St Kilda Road, Melbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060821015957/http://www.150.theage.com.au/view_bestofarticle.asp?straction=update&inttype=1&intid=704 to http://150.theage.com.au/view_bestofarticle.asp?straction=update&inttype=1&intid=704

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)