Talk:St Margaret's Church, Ifield
![]() | St Margaret's Church, Ifield has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 8, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 14th-century life-size stone effigies of a knight and his wife in St Margaret's Church, Ifield (pictured), England, have been said to have an "inimitable sideways sway"? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
inimitable sideways sway
editwhat the heck is an inimitable sideways sway? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.95.121 (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- It's how Sir Nikolaus Pevsner, in his inimitable writing style, described the stone effigies. His architectural history books are full of such descriptions! Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 17:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- The question was, what does it mean?Petethewhistle (talk) 20:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Are the effigies semi-detached then? I'd also like to know what it means. Shir-El too 20:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- No, they are mounted on stone plinths. I interpret Pevsner's description as referring to the smooth, flowing lines with which they were carved, and the elegance they still have after more than six centuries (although they are a bit weathered, their details are still quite clear). Having said that, I'm no architectural historian, and Pevsner spent his life travelling around England looking at buildings and their contents; he didn't give praise lightly. Hope that helps a bit! Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 21:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Are the effigies semi-detached then? I'd also like to know what it means. Shir-El too 20:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- The question was, what does it mean?Petethewhistle (talk) 20:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
GA
editPossible GA candidate. -- Secisek (talk) 21:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on St Margaret's Church, Ifield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071118121317/http://www.crawley.gov.uk/stellent/groups/public/documents/adviceguidance/int116583.pdf to http://www.crawley.gov.uk/stellent/groups/public/documents/adviceguidance/int116583.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110726171542/http://www.ifieldparish.org/parish/parish.htm to http://www.ifieldparish.org/parish/parish.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)