Talk:St Nicholas, Blakeney/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Malleus Fatuorum in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Malleus Fatuorum (talk · contribs) 14:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The town
  • I'm a bit puzzled by this section. What is its relevance to the church?
  • Thanks for reviewing. It's just a short section to put some context to the location of the church, the seafaring tradition, and the success of the port which made the rebuilding in the 15th century possible. Should I call it "location" and/or amalgamate the relevant bits elsewhere? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • My preference would be to amalgamate whatever is relevant into one or more of the current sections. But I think that renaming it to Location would be sufficient for GA, although I'm not so sure about FA. Malleus Fatuorum 17:30, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Furnishings and Fittings
  • I think it definitely needs to be done before tackling FA, but the article clearly meets the GA criteria as it stands, as witnessed by the paucity of my comments here. It's certainly among the best church articles I've seen and I look forward to seeing it at FAC. Malleus Fatuorum 20:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "Most East Anglian churches lost their mediaeval furnishings". Elsewhere the spelling "medieval" has been used.
People
  • "Several stones bear the surname 'Long', a name carried by five of the crew of the Caroline on its epic rescue." Which was its epic rescue, the one on 7 January 1918 or the one the following day? Malleus Fatuorum 17:14, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Images
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.