Talk:St Paul's Tower

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Saga City in topic St Pauls Tower or St Paul's Tower?

Biased edit?

edit

This St Pauls Tower article contains comments that I would regard as opinion and bordering on a sales pitch. Much of the text sounds as though it has been lifted from a press release or similar. The link to the sales brochure reinforces this impression. It needs to be written in a more neutral manner. stan matthews 15:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Feel free to rewrite it! L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 01:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Recent report of administration section also contained speculative comments at the end of section (POV) ?, so have removed as other places for speculation. Administration is FACT so added news reports as references as ref section was missing any way. -BulldozerD11 (talk) 11:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

St Pauls Tower or St Paul's Tower?

edit

The apostrophed version seem to predominate in the article but is missing from the article name. Which is right? S a g a C i t y (talk) 07:42, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply