Talk:St Peter's Church, Sudbury/GA1
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 14:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Sufficeintly references, sources, apper to be RS, no evidence of OR
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
I wonder if there is anything more to be added; famous vicars?; notable burials; is there a graveyard?
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Licensed and captioned
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Just the lead and queries in the coverage section. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- OK, that is good enough now. I am happy to list. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 16:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Just the lead and queries in the coverage section. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Responses
editI've expanded the lead and I think that it now summarises the article as a whole. As for broadness, I don't seem to be able to find anything regarding famous vicars or notable burials. There is a tiny burial area around the church, but I can't find a RS for this. I'm sure that it's particularly notable anyway. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 11:34, 18 March 2011 (UTC)