This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I have been watching with interest the growth of this article. It has the makings of a very good article, but it will have no credibility in Wikipedia if it is not properly referenced. Can I suggest that the editors add full references now or soon - the sooner the better. Ideally every statement should be referenced, preferably with inline citations; the editors must have obtained the information from somewhere. For guidance on this, see WP:V, and WP:CS. There are plenty of church articles to show you how it works. Good luck with the further growth and development of this promising article.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am sorry to see you have deleted my last message (this is bad Wiki-etiquette). The point that I was trying to make is that this is an encyclopedia, and every statement has to be backed up by verification (ie it is not a tourist guide or something like that). I continue to offer my best wishes for the successful development of the article.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 15:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
