Talk:Stable isotope standards and capture by anti-peptide antibodies
Latest comment: 7 years ago by MereTechnicality in topic Neutrality question
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stable isotope standards and capture by anti-peptide antibodies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Neutrality question
editI'd like to understand and address the neutrality dispute added to this page. What is the problem and how do we fix it? - Nleighanderson
- Hi, Nleighanderson. First, please remember to sign your posts using four tildes. (Like this: ~~~~) Second, the neutrality issue is because the article contains words I identified as puffery; it makes it seem a bit like promotion, but fixable enough not to warrant speedy deletion. Here's an example: "The SISCAPA workflow adds a unique enrichment step to the isotope dilution method" contains the word "unique," which, while it may be true, has a hint of puffery. However, the bigger problem is the article's use of overly technical terms which can confuse the average reader (including me!). Example: what does "patented immunoaffinity enrichment sample preparation workflow" mean? This article is fine to be on Wikipedia, but if you could assist me in cleaning up the problems as I listed above, that would be wonderful! Please refer to Wikipedia:Make technical articles understandable for help with making it more understandable, and to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view on how to present the article in a more neutral way. I hope this helped, and feel free to ask me any more questions you might have! MereTechnicality ⚙ 13:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)