Talk:Stade de Luxembourg
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Community Tech bot in topic Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contoversy concerning the name - why delete it ?
editWhat is the reason to constantly deleting the section about the naming controversy of the stadium ? There are enough quotes that confirm there was a huge controversy concerning the naming of the stadium. I also added your text about how the petition was rejected by the chamber of deputies! So why delete this text ?
Kind regards, Letzebuergerr
- As per Wikipedia:Criticism, there is no need for a controversy section, and it seems that by repeatedly trying to include one you are pushing an agenda, which is contrary to WP:NPOV. That there was any criticism of the name is made abundantly clear in the sentence: "In September 2020, the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies rejected a petition to amend the name using the Luxembourgish language." Even that is probably overstating it, because as I gather the petition failed to get enough signatures. Just to give you an idea of how small a "controversy" it was, the official petition to change the name only gathered a total of 1,081 signatures out of the necessary 4,500 signatures required for a proper parliamentary debate. Luxofluxo (talk) 17:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)