Talk:Stalingrad (Beevor book)

Fair use rationale for Image:Stalingradbook.jpg

Image:Stalingradbook.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

External Link

The external link does not work (at least for me). ATBS 11:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by ATBS (talk • contribs)

Try it now. Geoff B (talk) 19:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Works ok for me now. ATBS 08:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)ATBS —Preceding unsigned comment added by ATBS (talk • contribs)

The article needs to be reworked to make it more objective

Despite evident attempts by earlier editors to remove POV material from this article, it reads at present like a rehash of Barbarossa up to Stalingrad written by a fan of Beevor's book rather than an encyclopaedic article about the book itself. What it needs is an editor or several editors familiar not only with this book but also other books on that subject, who can then objectively outline what is unique about Beevor's book, and its critical reception both by press and by historians. Meanwhile other editors will be within their rights to cut all non-encyclopaedic material from this article. Alfietucker (talk) 20:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stalingrad (book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150207125307/http://www.wolfson.org.uk/history-prize/previous-winners/ to http://www.wolfson.org.uk/history-prize/previous-winners/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 8 December 2017 (UTC)