Talk:Star Trek: Section 31 (novel series)

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 30 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Star Trek: Section 31 to Star Trek: Section 31 (novel series). The result of the discussion was moved.

Image copyright problem with File:Cloak (novel).jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image File:Cloak (novel).jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 30 March 2024

Latest comment: 6 months ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 03:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

– In the two months since the film article was moved to the mainspace it has been viewed more times than the novel article has in the last four years. The film is also likely to receive even more attention as marketing ramps up and then once the film is released, while it unlikely that the novel article will have any major boost in attention anytime soon. I think the film article is clearly the primary topic here. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support per WP:PTOP. This seems non-controversial. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) (brought here by WP:TREK).Reply
Support The film is clearly the primary topic. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 11:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
* Support per WP:PTOP. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 07:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic