Talk:Star Trek: The God Thing/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 12:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

I'll take this one on unless there are any objections. Midnightblueowl (talk) 12:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments:

Some of the prose currently assumes too much prior knowledge of the Star Trek universe. For instance, in the Plot section we refer to the Enterprise without stating what it is, we refer to Vulcan without stating that it is a planet, nor that it is Spock's homeworld. The Enterprise is mentioned for a second time in that section yet not italicised. Have a read through and make some alterations of this nature. Midnightblueowl (talk) 12:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for taking on this review. I've gone through the plot and modified it to make it clearer (i.e. starship Enterprise and stating that Spock was returning to his homeworld, Vulcan, etc). Also fixed those italics. Miyagawa (talk) 13:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

@Miyagawa: Thank you; I'm now happy to pass this. As a suggestion however, I would recommend that you use Webcite or some such site in order to archive the links used in this article. That way, even if the original websites succumb to link rot, we still have a copy of the web pages that we can cite in the article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:35, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

That's a very good idea. I'll go do that now. Thanks again for reviewing. Miyagawa (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Table:

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.