Talk:Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire

Star Wars template placement

Can we PLEASE once and for all determine whether or not the StarWars template belongs on this site? Because I seem to think it does, but Copperchair seems to disagree. I think a consensus is necessary because we're in the middle of a revert war, and I think that one over something as small as a template is really asinine. Anyone else agree with me on this? Anthony 21:34, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

I have started a mediation process here. I dislike these universe spanning templates, as they tend to clutter the page. The category system should suffice in most cases, though a small stylish template could be very useful. - Dr Haggis -Talk 22:37, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Trivia

The last two points under "Trivia" sound more like something out of a game guide than something which I would consider an interesting side-note to the article. Is that just me? Confusing Manifestation 13:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

No, I agree they should be taken out KurtFF8 01:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Another Tie-In

Several missions in the X-Wing Alliance game refer to Shadows timeline, including the missions to acquire the design schematics of the Death Star II. --131.207.161.152 12:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll add that info to the page. --The Wookieepedian 14:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Ext. links

Maybe... maybe we could start pruning and splitting into sub-headers the external links? --maru (talk) contribs 18:13, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Sub-headers will work, IMHO. The Wookieepedian 18:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Opening crawl???

"Episode V.V"? Decimal roman numerals? This must be a joke of some kind. Anyway, this text is from the back cover of the book. It is not even used in the game or in the comics, which feature real opening crawls. I am going to delete this section in the very near future. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

I must also point out that this articles has several errors and inconsistencies, such as referring to this project as a movie. This is not the case. Maclaine 21:20, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree, stuff like "The venture paved the way for the theatrical release of the Star Wars Trilogy: Special Edition in the following year, and the later releases of the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy." implies that the project had something to do with the movies, which is untrue. Sdicht 19:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Interesting then that elements from it (the Outrider, SotE swoop bikes, etc.) were added to the Special Edition of ANH... ;) Plus you've got to understand the context of that quote. In that insatnce, it was referring to the fact that the marketing techniques were testbeds for the SEs and PT. The Wookieepedian 03:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Film Infobox

I am removing the infobox of this article, for one simple reason: Shadows of the Empire is not, and never was, a movie. It was not directed by John Knoll. His participation in the project was zero. Jon Knoles, an unrelated LucasArts employee, was the game project leader. The "cast" only appears in the game also. No movie script was written by Steve Perry and/or John Wagner, and so on. If you really dig on infoboxes, try creating one for Milton Soares's fan film. It will be (a little less) ridiculous. Maclaine 12:16, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

This was a media project going over several medias. Close enough i think. Jedi6-(need help?) 13:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shadows of the empire.jpg

Image:Shadows of the empire.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shadows of the empire bookcover.jpg

Image:Shadows of the empire bookcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

misc.

I restored some of the miscellaneous material deleted without discussion. Some of it was indeed to o trivial to include, and I didnt restore that part. DGG (talk) 14:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 17:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Music

What was the major new piece of music introduced with the videogame soundtrack? I wish I could describe it, but it's now being played on the Clone Wars cartoon commercial. What's the name of the song? --Criticalthinker (talk) 09:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

• * *

This is incorrect: "Representatives from Lucasfilm first approached John Williams to provide an original score. Williams declined" Williams was never approached for the project and was quite upset after he found out about it after the fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.16.115.66 (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

C-Class rated for Comics Project

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

The conversation between Darth Vader and the Emperor

There was this conversation between Darth Vader and Emperor Palpatine at the beginning of the book I'm very concerned about. In the book the Emperor says to Vader: "We have a new enemy. Luke Skywalker.", while in the 2004 DVD version of Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back the Emperor says to Vader: "We have a new enemy. The young Rebel who destroyed the Death Star. I have no doubt this boy is the offspring of Anakin Skywalker.".

Why didn't they include that line from the 2004 DVD version of Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back in the book Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire? Please give me one reason why they should've done it years ago. AdamDeanHall (talk) 18:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060221222916/http://www.soundtrack.net/soundtracks/database/?id=376 to http://www.soundtrack.net/soundtracks/database/?id=376
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090212145616/http://www.soundtrack-express.com/osts/shadows.htm to http://www.soundtrack-express.com/osts/shadows.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)