Talk:Star Wars: The Force Unleashed II/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by GreatOrangePumpkin in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    "The Nintendo handheld is designed around allowing players to quickly get into or out of the game.[9]" - I am confused about the "about"
    ? reworded, see if it's clearer --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
    What is "Slave I"?
     Y reworded --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Who are Ewoks?
     Y linked --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Many links missing in this section (Chewbacca, Han Solo, etc)
    ? linked to these characters, but I would need to know specifics as to what else needs wikilinked. --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Ref 68 does not lead to any site
    ? There is no site to follow. Nintendo Power is a print-only magazine and I don't have access to the issue. --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
    In any event, that particular bit can be seen on Metacritic. I can replace it with an online source, if you want. —DAP388 (talk) 18:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
    The concern is that it states December as against October 22. Were there multiple reviews of Nintedo Power? It would be nice if you would replace it, DAP.--GoPTCN 08:44, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Use pp only for several pages
     Y fixed --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Inconsistent date style
     Y fixed --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall: These issues hinder the article's promotion to GA status--GoPTCN 15:28, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Pass/Fail:  
  • If you want to take this to FAC in future: Prose needs to be simplified a bit for our general users, plot needs to be expanded if possible (I know it is remarked that the story is rather short and boring), the references should be high-quality, as the reviewers there are very nitpicky (for example, try remove the redundant references)--GoPTCN 16:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Reply