Talk:Star Wars: The Force Unleashed II/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by GreatOrangePumpkin in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- "The Nintendo handheld is designed around allowing players to quickly get into or out of the game.[9]" - I am confused about the "about"
- ? reworded, see if it's clearer --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- What is "Slave I"?
- reworded --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Who are Ewoks?
- linked --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Many links missing in this section (Chewbacca, Han Solo, etc)
- ? linked to these characters, but I would need to know specifics as to what else needs wikilinked. --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- "The Nintendo handheld is designed around allowing players to quickly get into or out of the game.[9]" - I am confused about the "about"
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Ref 68 does not lead to any site
- ? There is no site to follow. Nintendo Power is a print-only magazine and I don't have access to the issue. --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- In any event, that particular bit can be seen on Metacritic. I can replace it with an online source, if you want. —DAP388 (talk) 18:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- The concern is that it states December as against October 22. Were there multiple reviews of Nintedo Power? It would be nice if you would replace it, DAP.--GoPTCN 08:44, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- In any event, that particular bit can be seen on Metacritic. I can replace it with an online source, if you want. —DAP388 (talk) 18:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- ? There is no site to follow. Nintendo Power is a print-only magazine and I don't have access to the issue. --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Use pp only for several pages
- fixed --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Inconsistent date style
- fixed --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ref 68 does not lead to any site
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: These issues hinder the article's promotion to GA status--GoPTCN 15:28, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass There is a minor issue regarding the Nintendo Power magazine. But as this is the only concern, I will promote this article. Regards.--GoPTCN 16:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- If you want to take this to FAC in future: Prose needs to be simplified a bit for our general users, plot needs to be expanded if possible (I know it is remarked that the story is rather short and boring), the references should be high-quality, as the reviewers there are very nitpicky (for example, try remove the redundant references)--GoPTCN 16:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)