Talk:Stargate SG-1 season 10
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Sgeureka in topic Deleted "Production" section
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Last version fo episode articles before they were redirected here
editFor merging, transwikiing, etc.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morpheus_%28Stargate_SG-1%29&oldid=185079988
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Insiders_%28Stargate_SG-1%29&oldid=183844837
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uninvited_%28Stargate_SG-1%29&oldid=185080008
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Counterstrike_%28Stargate_SG-1%29&oldid=185542712
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Memento_Mori_%28Stargate_SG-1%29&oldid=184340316
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Company_of_Thieves&oldid=185080050
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Line_in_the_Sand_%28Stargate_SG-1%29&oldid=185080493
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bounty_%28Stargate_SG-1%29&oldid=186286865
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_Guys_%28Stargate_SG-1%29&oldid=182813184
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talion_%28Stargate_SG-1%29&oldid=184715734
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Family_Ties_%28Stargate_SG-1%29&oldid=184535643
Merger of Company of Thieves
editCompany of Thieves doesn't contain anything that can't fit into this season article as well. Unless the article is expanded to something like Zero Hour (Stargate SG-1), I see no reason not to merge (per WP:EPISODE). – sgeureka t•c 11:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Merged. – sgeureka t•c 15:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
avetao or anetao?
editis the name of the person who hijaks th Odessy Avetao or Anetao? both of those spellings were used in the episode description.Hawkey131 (talk) 16:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted "Production" section
editIt was a trivia section in disguise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.102.244 (talk) 04:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- On the surface, I'd partly agree, but everything is trivia until put into context. What the section needs is more context, not removal. I have therefore reverted (for now). – sgeureka t•c 08:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- I put the information from the "Production" section into the relevant episodes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.102.244 (talk) 01:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- I had to revert because something got screwed up, and I couldn't figure out what. (Plus, because of the transclusion, the production detail would also show up in the episode list, which is undesirable.) – sgeureka t•c 10:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)