Talk:Stars & Stripes (America's Cup syndicate)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Changes

edit

I made a few changes to the 1988 section. Firstly, I changed the no time part to limited time. I'm not quite sure how long they had to answer the challenge in but they obviously had some time otherwise they couldn't have designed the 2 catamarans. Whether the time they had was insufficient time or just decided to be dickheads is always going to be debated so best to say limited time.

I also changed the part about design being unrestricted. Team NZ's argument in the court case was that there was design requirements/restrictions since a race between a catamaran and a big boat couldn't be called a match and the deed called for a match. The court eventually ruled in favour of SDYC but there is still great debate who was right. In cases like this, it's best to take the most neutral and factual answer. I think all sides agree that there was no explicit design requirements specified in the original deed so if we just stay this, there's no problem Nil Einne 16:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Catamaran-hull yachts

edit

Editor WPPilot left this on my talk page. I've copied it here because discussion about articles belongs on article talk pages.

I created this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morrelli,_Chance_%26_Hubbart_%26_MacLane&redirect=no and if you look into the history you will see the bios that I wrote and researched in great detail. I posted the story on the wetta tri page on facebook well after I wrote it, some discussion regarding merging this data onto the Stars and Stripes page, and I am just now doing it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morrelli,_Chance_%26_Hubbart_%26_MacLane&action=history
Please refrain from removing it, if you have something to say please use the talk pages. Thank you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Morrelli,_Chance_%26_Hubbart_%26_MacLane --WPPilot 23:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Editor WPPilot's comments refer to a reversion that I made. WPPilot added a fair amount of text to §Catamaran-hull yachts. That text, in my opinion, was/is poorly constructed and something about it just didn't feel right. On a hunch, I googled several passages from WPPilot's addition and found that the new article text significantly matched text found on Facebook. Because the new text appeared to be a copy and paste from Facebook, and therefore apparently plagiarism, I deleted it.

Now, Editor WPPilot asserts that the Facebook posting is his writing. That seems to be true. Still, WPPilot, you need to rewrite it so that it's quality improves. Simply tossing it in as you've done, declaring the job done, and going off to do something else, hasn't significantly improved the article.

Trappist the monk (talk) 00:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Stars & Stripes (America's Cup syndicate). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:40, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply