Talk:State-sponsored Internet propaganda
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the State-sponsored Internet propaganda article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editCan we also include Israels Hasbara efforts? For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasbara_Fellowships or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jewish_Internet_Defense_Force or http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-23695896 Yuluka82 (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- Are they state-sponsored and do they employ the use of sockpuppets? I can't tell from a quick glance at those articles. Esn (talk) 02:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Serbia - "SNS bot"
editInternet sockpuppetry also exists in Serbia and it's mainly organised by the Serbian Progressive Party (the governing party in Serbia, in the local language is abbreviated as "SNS"), while the term "bot" refers to the robotic behaviour of the sockpuppets.
Can we find a better title for this article?
edit"State-sponsored internet propaganda" is mentioned in very few online sources except for Wikipedia, so it may be a neologism that was created by this article's author. Is there a more widely-used phrase that describes the article's topic? Jarble (talk) 21:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)