Talk:State Highway 50 (New Zealand)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Schwede66 in topic Rationale for de-PROD
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of State Highway 50 (New Zealand) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Rationale for de-PROD
editPer WP:ROADOUTCOMES, a state highway is typically considered notable. Since this article is so new, and it is probable that the article would not be deleted at AfD, I have removed the PROD. Imzadi 1979 → 21:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Imzadi1979:, an essay is not Wikipedia policy. Tutelary (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- I would argue that any state highway in New Zealand would be automatically notable. They only become state highways if they have a very important traffic function. Schwede66 05:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)