Talk:Statue of James Outram, London
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Ham II in topic Own article
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Statue of James Outram, London article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Own article
editShould this have its own article? We don't have anything much about the statue here and I am not sure it is notable as an artwork. Would it not be better to move this all into the James Outram article? --DanielRigal (talk) 15:58, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- @DanielRigal: The statue was originally intended for, but rejected for, Trafalgar Square, which is quite interesting! As a Grade II-listed statue it's as notable as many of the works already in Category:Statues in London; the others in that category listed at that grade are the statues of the Duke of Cambridge, Clive of India, Captain Cook, Oliver Cromwell, the Earl of Derby, the Duke of Devonshire, Disraeli, Haig, Havelock, Irving, Jenner, Myddelton, Napier, Palmerston, Peel, Raikes, Reynolds, Shakespeare, White and Wolseley. I'll work on the article later in the week. Ham II (talk) 20:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Whitehall
editThis source refers to the "Whitehall section" of the gardens. Is this worth including in the article? ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)