Talk:Statue of Lakshmi-Narayana

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 17:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Statue of Laxmi-Narayan at the Dallas Museum of Art in 2017

• ... that historic Statue of Laxmi-Narayan (pictured) was replaced by an appalling replica after being stolen in 1984? Source: Nepali Times

• Reviewed: Hudson Terminal

Created by CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk). Self-nominated at 13:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC).

• New enough, long enough, well sourced. The photographs are appropriately licensed.

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: the hook doesn't work in my opinion. We can't say "appalling" replica, and without that word the hook is not interesting. I think a better hook would be to state – with better words – that the object was on display in the Dallas museum for [xxx] years despite having been stolen. Onceinawhile (talk) 20:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

• ALT1: ... that the historic Statue of Laxmi-Narayan (pictured) was returned to Nepal by the Dallas Museum of Art after being stolen for 37 years?
• ALT2: ... that the historic Statue of Laxmi-Narayan (pictured) was on display in the Dallas Museum of Art for 37 years despite having been stolen?

Onceinawhile, I have added new hooks. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Looks good, sources well to this article. Onceinawhile (talk) 13:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)