Talk:Stavropol Krai

Latest comment: 2 years ago by User123456789123 in topic File:Bandera de Nakhitxevan.svg Nominated for Deletion

File:Bandera de Nakhitxevan.svg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Bandera de Nakhitxevan.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The image https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stavropol_Krai#/media/File:Map_of_Russia_-_Stavropol_Krai.svg shows Crimea as part of the Russian Federation. Crimea is officially and legaly a part of Ukraine and illegaly accupied by Russian Federation armed forces. Please correct the map. User123456789123 (talk) 07:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Established October, 1924?

edit

The shape of North Caucasus Krai was not that of later Stavropol Krai then - it was much bigger - and in the end Stavropol wasn't its capital. So in which way Stavropol Krai should be established October 1924 ? Notice that Azov-Black Sea Krai with Rostov, the capital of N. C. Krai from 1924 on, was split away from N. C. Krai in 1934. Rather December 1936 fits as founding date of Stavropol Krai, when according to Soviet Constitution of 1936 Dagestan ASSR and 3 to date Autonomous Oblasti of North Caucasus were separated from N. C. Krai. Then named city Voroshilovsk (today Stavropol) became capital of N. C. krai (1937 renamend Ordzhonikidze Krai, 1943 Stavropol Krai), and its territory roughly was stable since then to our days. --88.217.113.23 (talk) 10:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

You have a point, it is a somewhat ambiguous choice (which is why there is a footnote), but there just isn't winning here. No matter which date you pick, someone's going to be unhappy about it :)
Here's how it goes in this case. The date of "establishment" is definitely not always the one when the entity got its present name, and studying how the entity shape changed over time would be pure original research (plus, by that logic, the krai was most recently "established" in 1991, when Karachay-Cherkess Autonomous Oblast was transformed into a republic and split out). So, normally, the "establishment" date is the one given by the majority of sources, regardless of the rationale behind the choice. However, when those sources contradict one another or (like here) tend skirt the issue, then the date of the most recent establishment of an entity of the same type (in this case, a krai), covering the existing territory, is used. In this case, Stavropol Krai, formerly known as Ordzhonikidze Krai, formerly known as North Caucasus Krai, formerly a much bigger entity, was established in October 1924. One can also make an argument that the date should be February 1924 (like this source does), but since the krai/oblast status of South-East is ambiguous, October is used instead.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); August 11, 2017; 14:06 (UTC)
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stavropol Krai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply