Talk:Stay of exit
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
 | A fact from Stay of exit appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Contradiction in History section
editThe accused must pay full child support through age 18 in advance. BUT They can be jailed if they fail to make a monthly payment.
How could there be monthly payments if the lump sum has been paid in advance?
Perhaps the first condition only means "promise to pay in full"?
Clarification would be appreciated. Martindo (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing this out. While the previous version did mention that there was a payment option, it did not do a good job of explaining that in the event of a lump sum payment, the debtor would be allowed to leave immediately. I have now fixed that. Havradim leaf a message 22:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)