Talk:Stealing from the Saracens
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Unknown Temptation in topic Unimportant book - delete page
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Unimportant book - delete page
editA minor book by a minor writer - why has it its own wiki page?? Rustygecko (talk) 07:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Rustygecko You can take it to WP:AFD and nominate it for deletion if you want. The only person who seems to be still editing this page is the book's author, removing experts' criticism of the book's "big scoop". Now it's fallen off Twitter and Reddit's news cycle I can't imagine anybody except the author is going to be editing it, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Unknown Temptation (talk) 16:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- If the book is being sold on headlines of Notre Dame and Big Ben being based on Islamic architecture, then the views of experts on that hypothesis is essential for this article to have any kind of credibility. I don't edit much but having warned Diana Darke about Conflict of Interest, I will go to the admins if this is removed again Unknown Temptation (talk) 16:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)